Category Uncategorized
Another Day – Another TDS Blog to correct.
The article critiques Larry Walsh’s blog on President Trump, accusing it of bias and misinformation regarding Trump’s actions toward Brazil and the investigations into James Comey and John Brennan. It defends Trump’s tariffs on Brazil as legitimate, arguing they are part of a broader precedent among U.S. presidents. The author counters Walsh’s portrayal of Bolsonaro and highlights Lula’s past corruption to question Walsh’s credibility. Furthermore, it disputes Walsh’s claims of Trump defending dictators, emphasizing that Trump’s interactions were often transactional. Lastly, it asserts that the DOJ investigations into Comey and Brennan are based on serious allegations, not personal vendettas by Trump.
The Semantics of Jeffrey Epstein’s “Client List”: Unpacking the Narrative
The assertion that “Jeffrey Epstein didn’t have a client list” is often used to downplay allegations of criminal activities within his network. While Epstein may not have maintained a labeled list of clients, substantial evidence—including flight logs, contact lists, and victim testimonies—supports claims of his systematic exploitation and sex trafficking. His sophisticated operations involved fragmented records rather than a singular document of wrongdoing. A thorough forensic investigation could unveil more about his connections. Thus, shifting focus from the absence of a client list to the broader web of evidence is essential for understanding the true extent of his illicit activities and seeking justice for survivors.
How Europeans View the American Shift
Larry’s posts make me reflect on how my mornings have shifted from my childhood reading lighthearted humor of the Sunday Comics to the predictable outrage of Larry Walsh’s Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS)-fueled posts. His latest piece, “How Europeans View the American Shift,” is yet another echo of mainstream media talking points, lacking rigorous research, journalistic […]
Newsom’s Budget Cuts Disability Spending While Favoring Special Interests
Governor Gavin Newsom’s 2025-26 budget proposal reveals a $12 billion deficit and prioritizes special interests over vulnerable Californians, particularly those with disabilities. Major cuts include limits on In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) and reinstated asset tests for Medi-Cal, risking coverage for hundreds of thousands. While safeguarding funds for illegal immigration programs and public employee unions, the budget fails to address chronic underfunding of disability services, echoing a history of cuts by the Democratic Party. Advocates are urged to focus their criticisms on state leadership rather than federal issues, as Newsom’s actions jeopardize critical support for the disabled community.
LA. The Rehearsal, D.C.
Larry, your latest post, “L.A. The Rehearsal, D.C” . Is the Power Play presents another media-fueled biased rant that skips factual information and focuses heavily on emotional fearmongering. Your narrative frames troop deployment in Los Angeles and the upcoming D.C. parade as evidence of authoritarian overreach but detailed examination reveals your argument falls apart. Let’s […]
Time for Honesty: The Truth Behind the Chaos
Let’s call this what it really is. The so-called “protesters” wreaking havoc in Los Angeles are not champions of justice or defenders of democracy—they are rioters. Many of them are organized, some even paid, and all of them are being used as pawns in a larger game. These rioters claim to oppose the National Guard […]
Another Response to TDS Larry
The post critiques employers hiring illegal immigrants, demanding harsher penalties for such practices. It argues that Democratic leaders exacerbate the issue through divisive language that perpetuates stereotypes about immigrant labor. Such discussions overlook the importance of legal migrant worker programs like H-2A and H-2B, which address labor shortages in agriculture and other sectors. The content highlights the misleading narrative that illegal immigrants only fill low-skilled jobs, pointing to data showing their employment in varied industries. It concludes that Democrats’ open-border rhetoric serves corporate interests while neglecting the potential of unemployed Americans to take these roles at fair wages.
What Happens if California Stops Paying. Federal Taxes?
If California decided to stop paying federal taxes, the consequences would be seismic, legally questionable, and economically disastrous. Federal taxes fund critical infrastructure, services, and defense that California relies on. Here’s a breakdown of what could be at stake: Legally, withholding federal taxes is a non-starter. The IRS and federal courts would likely intervene, seizing […]
The Misguided Meme of “Three Coequal Branches” and Why Judicial Overreach Undermines the Executive Branch**
The viral meme “Political Science 101: There are 3 coequal branches of government in the US” has been making the rounds on social media, often shared with a smug sense of intellectual superiority. At first glance, it appears to be a harmless civics lesson, reinforcing a foundational concept taught in high school government classes. However, […]
The Big Beautiful Bill: This legislation represents progress towards reinstating judicial integrity and constitutional adherence.
The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025” (OBBBA) represents a decisive response to judicial overreach by aiming to control judges who place political interests above legal principles. The bill now before Congress contains measures to prevent judge shopping and keep federal judges within their constitutional limits. The bill contains tax breaks and spending cuts alongside […]
